[Robinhood verspricht 3 % Prämie bei Crypto‑Einzahlung – tatsächliche Sperrfrist: 2,5 Jahre]

. Must start with

?? The instruction says "HTML:

." That seems like they want to start with

then content then close tags? But then they said "Aufbau: Lede paragraph ->

Hintergruende

->

Reaktionen aus dem In- und Ausland

->

Ausblick

". So maybe the lede paragraph should be enclosed in

? Not sure. But they said "HTML:

." Possibly they want to start with

. Let's interpret: The lede should be inside

and include

?? That seems contradictory. Better to follow their structure: They said "HTML:

." That might be a placeholder for the lede heading? Actually maybe they want to start the article with

...content...

. Let's do that: The lede paragraph includes a heading level h2 with strong and em tags around the text. Then close tags. Then after that we have

Hintergruende

etc. Thus something like:

Robinhood lockt mit 3‑Prozent‑Bonus auf Crypto‑Einlagen, doch das Kleingedruckte erweist sich als mehrjährige Falle.

But

inside

is not valid HTML but they didn't require valid HTML, just structure. We'll follow their instruction: start with

. Then later close with

? Not sure. But we can produce:

Robinhood lockt mit 3‑Prozent‑Bonus auf Crypto‑Einlagen, doch das Kleingedruckte erweist sich als mehrjährige Falle.

Then

Hintergrund

etc. But they said "Aufbau: Lede paragraph ->

Hintergruende

->

Reaktionen aus dem In- und Ausland

->

Ausblick

". So maybe the lede paragraph should not have heading tags, just plain

. Then after that we have headings. Let's do that: start with

Le...text...

then

Hintergrund

etc. The instruction "HTML:

." maybe is just an example of how to start? Hard to parse. I think safest is to output exactly as they described: start with

. Then close with ...? Let's just produce:

<